Thursday, October 10, 2019
Market Structures and Pricing Essay
Market structures and pricing  Revenues  Consumers  * Inverse demand curve gives willingness-to-pay  * Benefit consumer(s) derive(s) from additional good;  * Area under inverse demand curve measures total willingness-to-pay, total benefit or total surplus. * Maximum price I can charge as producer determined by inverse demand function * Marginal revenues; revenue of next unit I sell  Strategies  * Profit maximization  * Marginal profits equal to 0 (MR=MC)  * Classic economic theory; entrepreneurial capitalism  * Owner makes strategic decisions  * Managerial capitalism;  * Ownership changed  * Control changed  * Potential conflicts between shareholders and management * Firms got bigger: coordinate difficulties  * Revenues maximization  * Decreasing revenues bad for image  * Financial institutions want certainty  * Low revenues mean relatively high risk for suppliers * Low revenues may lead to budget cuts, including management * Bonus  * MR=0  * Marketing effort  * Managerial utility maximization  * Managers maximize own satisfaction  * Growth maximization  * Long term strategy  * Behavioral theories  * Different groups, satisfy all groups to survive: satisfying * Altruistic objectives: public interest  * Welfare maximization  * What strategy is relevant?  * Autonomy and income advancement  * Successful business is most important personal objective * Growth objective  * Profit maximization  * Model  * Economic profit âⰠ  accounting profit  Market structures  * Perfect competition  * Monopolistic competition  * Oligopoly  * Monopoly  Perfect competition  * Many (small) suppliers and buyers: ââ¬Ëprice takesââ¬â¢  * Demand function for individual company  * Products are perfect substitutes  * Free entry and exit  * Information is perfect (available to all no cost)  * Free movement of products: supply responsive to market forces * Innovation exogenous: producers reactive rather than proactive.  * Benchmark: Welfare is maximized (p=mc)  * Efficiency  * Productive efficiency: AC cannot be lower  * MC curve passes though minimum of AC  * Allocative efficiency: resources are distributed and used as preferred by consumers: P=MC * Pareto efficiency: no one can be made better off without making anyone else worse off.  Monopoly  One seller; can influence price (output)  Price > marginal cost: economic inefficiency (although the firm itself may be  efficient) * Barriers to entry  * Initial costs  * Sunk costs  * Brand loyalty  * Economies of scale  * Patents and licenses  * Anti-competitive behavior  Revenues  * Demand: Q  * Inverse demand: P=a/b-1/b*Q  * Revenues: R = P*Q = Q*a/b-1/b*Qâââ  * Marginal revenue: âËâR/âËâQ  * Additional revenues from next unit sold  * âËâR/âËâQ = a/b-2/b*Q  * Twice as steep as inverse demand  * Positive if à µÃ'⬠< -1  * Demand is elastic (point-elastic)  Natural monopoly  * Market can only sustain 1 producer  * Competition (P=MC): all competitors make a loss  * P>MC: loss when P help to sustain monopoly or oligopoly * Government; policy regulation  * Spatial pre-emption; new entrants do not have access to necessary inputs * Cost barriers  * Reputation: customer loyalty, safety  * Exit barriers: shrinking a firm is expensive (labor, capacity) * Entry-deterring strategies; pricing, spare-capacity, corporate deals (price discrimination)  Oligopoly: non-corporate behavior  * Competition based on output (quantity) or price.  * Two basic oligopoly models:  * Cournot (quantity competition)  * Bertrand (price competition)  * Cournot: firms determine output simultaneously, and the bring this to the market; * Bertrand: firms announce prices. Demand is allocated to low-price firm(s), who then produce(s) demand  Cournot competition  * Assumes that firms produce identical products  * Demand: Q=a-b*P  * Inverse demand: P=a/b-1/b*Q  * Now we have 2 producers (duopoly): P=a/b-1/b*(Q1+Q2)  * Profits maximized when MR=MC (Equivalent to monopolists), taking the competitors action as given. * Inverse demand: P=a/b-1/b*(Q1+Q2)  * Revenues firm 1: R1=Q1*[a/b-1/b*(Q1+Q2)]  * Marginal revenues: MR1=a/b-1/b*(2*Q1+Q2)  * Equilibrium: MR1=MC1  * Expression in Q1 and Q2  * Similar expression for company 2  * MR1: âËâR1/âËâQ1 =  * P*âËâQ1/âËâQ1 + Q1*âËâP/âËâQ1  * P + âËâP/âËâQ1*Q1  * 1 + (âËâP/âËâQ1*Q1/P)*P  * (1+1/à µp)*P  * MR1=MC1: (1+1/à µp)*P=MC1  * P=MC1/(1+1/à µp)  * Cournot oligopolist sets price above MC!  * ââ¬âSame for monopoly  Bertrand oligopoly  * Price competition (again assume identical goods)  * Firms announce prices. Demand is allocated to low-price firm(s), who then produces demand. * If a firm sets above its competitorââ¬â¢s price, clients will prefer the competitors (identical goods). * Bertrand equilibrium is therefore equivalent to competitive equilibrium: price equals marginal cost.  Price discrimination  * Conditions:  * Market power  * Different groups of consumers (based on willingness-to-pay, demand elasticity etc.) -> segmentation * Resale is not possible  * Cost of discrimination may not exceed additional profits * Market should be transparent.  * Charge different (groups of) consumers different prices to maximize profits -> price discrimination * First, second and third degree  First degree pricing discrimination  * Perfect discrimination: each unit of output sold at different price; * Price determined by inverse demand curve;  * What is the optimal output?  Second degree price discrimination  * Non-linear pricing: price depends on how much you buy;  * Fundamentals;  * Application;  * Consumer decides on how much to buy;  * Self selection constraints  * 2 consumers each spends Ri to receive Xi  * Buy Xi if benefitsi (Xi)-Ri >0  * Benefits 1 (X1)-R1> benefits1 (X2)-r2  * Benefits 2 (X2)-R2> benefits2 (X2)-r1  * Consider an individual demand function (for convenience, marginal costs are 0) * Monopolists want to supply X1 at a total price of A  * Consider two individual demand functions  * Monopolist would like to supply X1 at A+B+C and X2 at A  * But: if consumer 1 also purchase X2 at a price of A, he/she will get surplus B (self selection) * If the monopolists would charge A+C for X1, consumer 1 gets surplus B and the monopolist higher profits. Can the  monopolist get higher profits? * Make X2 unattractive for consumer 1`  * Offering less of X2 (loss of monopolist) allows for higher profits from X1.  Third degree price discrimination  * Set prices for different groups of consumers: examples?  Summary  * Profit maximization  * Monopoly, perfect competition: two extremes.  * Regulation of monopoly: incentives.  * Cournot oligopoly:  * decide on production, then price determined in market * Cournot ologipolist has monopoly power (p>mc)  * Bertrand:  * decide on price, then output determined in market; p = mc * Price discrimination  * Higher profits  * Market power    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.